Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pac-Man Must Die!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unclear if he must die, but according to those who attended this AfD, he must be deleted. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pac-Man Must Die![edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was not able to find any significant coverage on this from reliable, third-party sources. Not sure if the sources this page uses are reliable, either. Namcokid 47 ^(Contribs) 22:09, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No independent coverage, seems to be just a coding project made for fun. While I would like to try it at some point, my opinion doesn't have determine notability. In this case, the game is not notable, with no third-party coverage. Utopes (talk) 01:07, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:56, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:56, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete find no reliable independent sources, It’s not notable. Nikoo.Amini (talk) 01:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 23:49, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.