Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pablo Ramirez (skateboarder)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Rollidan (talk) 03:20, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pablo Ramirez (skateboarder)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to have been the subject of substantial coverage before his death. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:56, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:11, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:11, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:11, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I respectfully disagree. This article in the SF examiner explains Pablo's significance well.I just added three links and new info of substantial coverage pre-death including a list of his skate parts. I should have included them earlier. RIP Pablo. 1. GQ magazine article 2. full-length video part published in Roll Up video through Thrasher Magazine 3. gx1000 El Camino video - also published on Thrasher --Wil540 art (talk) 18:07, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:17, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Scott Burley (talk) 02:04, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I think the coverage is significant enough for the GNG. No Great Shaker (talk) 12:31, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Has made a "unique, prolific or innovative contributions" to skateboarding (or close enough to as per San Fran Examiner article pointed out above), plenty of coverage before and after his death (again as pointed out above). This is a keep. Josalm64rc (talk) 01:48, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.