Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pablo Huffaker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:12, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pablo Huffaker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't know the notability of monster truck drivers, but all the sourcing I found on google are passing mentions about the trucks he drives and such. For me he fails WP:BIO Delete Secret ^account 17:52, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - That he passes WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG is supported by [1] and [2] Kugao (talk) 19:57, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:19, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Kugao has provided two links. One is a passing mention. The other doesn't actually mention him at all. GNews provides several hits for the name. They're mostly behind paywalls, but the previews tend to read something like "Grave Digger will be driven by Pablo Huffaker". Passing mentions are not what the GNG asks for. I don't get the impression participating in Monster Jam passes our criteria for professional motorsports, either. » scoops “5x5„ 23:56, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Kugao, are you even trying here? Please read the GNG and other notability criteria, which say explicitly that for a source to qualify, it must discuss the subject in "significant detail." This isn't the first suspect AfD vote this past week, and it isn't the first dozenth. Ravenswing 17:25, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.