Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P Chips Frauds
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Black Kite (t) (c) 02:27, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- P Chips Frauds (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Attack page, designed to denigrate the companies mentioned in the article. I don't believe this is salvageable. Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 15:06, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Users commenting in this discussion might also want to comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of fraud involving Chinese stocks and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S-Chips Scandals, which are related. lifebaka++ 16:32, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or stubify. Companies going bankrupt? In a global recession? Corporate corruption? Not quite notable as a concept in and of itself. Add in minimal sourcing, extreme POV commentary and this is simply beyond salvage. There might be something there as a concept, but this would need to be hammered back to a stub and re-written from scratch. Ravensfire (talk) 15:07, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. —Michaela den (talk) 10:03, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:24, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete: Why wasn't this speedied as an attack page? ῲ Ravenswing ῴ 21:49, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.