Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PLIB (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. -- ferret (talk) 15:03, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PLIB[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Run-of-the-mill software, fails WP:NSOFT and WP:GNG. A quick Google search brings up very little. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 08:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (📧) 09:20, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (📧) 09:20, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:19, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.