Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PEOBASE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:04, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PEOBASE[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. Antigng (talk) 03:57, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. 04:01, 5 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antigng (talk • contribs)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Pishcal — ♣ 05:41, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Google search reveals no references apart from LinkedIn, ie none that show that the company is notable. Pishcal — ♣ 05:41, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This company's director has been invited as guest on a RTHK radio programme twice in 2014. And here are the links, 2014-07-30 U秀求職新鮮人 and 2014-08-06 U秀求職新鮮人 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.125.196.83 (talk) 03:37, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Reply Notability cannot be inherited. WP:ORG:"An organization is not notable merely because a notable person or event was associated with it. "--Antigng (talk) 11:52, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The company is the supporting organization of Tech X Social – Idea Generation Zone which organizaed by Microsoft — Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.125.196.83 (talk) 07:20, 9 June 2015 (UTC) Same IP address as prior "Keep" recommendation.--Rpclod (talk) 12:10, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:12, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7: "does not indicate why its subject is important or significant". QVVERTYVS (hm?) 08:20, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - one reference merely points to the subject's website; the other does not mention the subject. No indication that this company meets WP:ORGDEPTH criteria.--Rpclod (talk) 12:07, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.