Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P2P Foundation

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2021 June 28.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 20:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

P2P Foundation[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG; not notable outside of posts by Satoshi Nakamoto, and it is already adequately covered in that article. Guy Macon (talk) 15:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:35, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:35, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it stands - yeah, all the RS coverage in English is passing mentions or about Satoshi Nakamoto, and most webpages talking about the P2P Foundation are self-sourcing in some manner. The other language Wikipedia articles are mostly this article translated. There may be sources that demonstrate notability, but we'd need them to save the article. A lot of p2pfoundation links in other Wikipedia articles seem promotional as well - David Gerard (talk) 12:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's a small organization working on a small budget. Not much traction. gidonb (talk) 03:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Their work is sometimes cited, but nothing suggests the organization meets WP:NORG/GNG (I can't find any source discussing the organization, its significance, history, etc.). On a side note, I do wonder why so much of their work (from their websites) is on Google Scholar. What criteria are used to get a website indexed there? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.