Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. Sathasivam
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. SK#1: nom withdrawn, and no other deletion arguments. Also, nom proposes non-deletion action (merge) instead of deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Proposed mergers to start a merge discussion. (non-admin closure) czar · · 17:16, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
P. Sathasivam[edit]
- P. Sathasivam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
this article needs to be merged into P Sathasivam. Uncletomwood (talk) 08:39, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep P. Sathasivam is the name in Supreme Court of India website see this — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gfosankar (talk • contribs) 12:21, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Signalizing (talk) 13:50, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Signalizing (talk) 13:50, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:23, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:23, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. P. Sathasivam is the correct title per Wikipedia naming conventions and this is the established article. P .Sathasivam is a duplicate. Anyhow, AfD is for deletions, not merges. • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok I see the logic,I would like to withdraw the Afd.But i gave a DYK nomination what about that?Do i get the credit or does the original aricle get it.Also bringing to notice that the original article didnt have much of info but it is me who bought a lot of info.The editor of te original article just copied parts of my article Uncletomwood (talk) 14:52, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.