Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P.P. Pandey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Ishrat Jahan case. Courcelles 04:35, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

P.P. Pandey[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Person not notable outside the context of Death of Ishrat Jahan and the article also don't show any other notability. Previous PROD contested with "better to discuss in AfD" reason. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:36, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:CRIME as the person was in office before his conviction. He was 1982-batch IPS officer and police commissioner of Ahmedabad, Gujarat.--Benfold (talk) 07:54, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Conviction? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:51, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:56, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:56, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:56, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Ishrat Jahan case as the person has no notability outside this event. A m i t 웃 17:07, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Whats to merge? The article has no relevant content that's not already present in the target article. Do you mean redirect instead of merge? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 17:33, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect is likely what will happen if a merge is the result of this discussion.Pectore^talk 01:24, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - to Ishrat Jahan case - all material is better suited for that page. This is merely a POV fork.Pectore^talk 01:24, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 00:40, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per discussion above. Candleabracadabra (talk) 01:20, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.