Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pârâul Varului

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 00:19, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pârâul Varului[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This stream does not meet the WP:Notability guideline (significant coverage in reliable sources). The only mentions I found of Pârâul Varului (apart from Wikipedia and clones) were about a stream with the same name flowing into the Mureș. It is shown on a detailed hiking map as a short stream (about 1 km long) southwest of the village Valea Zălanului. Markussep ^Talk 17:51, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:57, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:27, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 21:01, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For clarity: the other stream Pârâul Varului I mentioned above flows into the Mureș near Izvorul Mureșului in Harghita County, and is probably not notable either. The stream described in this article flows into the Pârâul Bradului, which is a short tributary of the Tecșe, in Covasna County. Markussep ^Talk 10:51, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As a simple stream lacking substantive sources with details beyond location it does not appear to pass WP:GEOLAND. Reywas92^Talk 18:35, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:GEOLAND says a stream may be notable provided there is enough information beyond statistics and coordinates - the article does not even provide the basic statistics and coordinates, nothing to show that the stream itself is notable - it's a run of the mill stream WP:MILL - we need something to show that the stream is unique to distinguish it from millions of other streams - no references to establish notability, no significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources - also Wikipedia:One sentence does not an article make - Epinoia (talk) 20:51, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.