Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pâmela Butt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:46, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pâmela Butt[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing in Google news and my first five pages of google results didn’t return a singe RS. That leaves a two line quotation in the guardian which is neither substantive nor independent and pretty much that’s it. Fails ENT and GNG Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:02, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Television, Sexuality and gender, Italy, and Brazil. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:05, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:13, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not even close to meeting any notability standards.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment always unsure about these pornographic performer articles, I'd say she's just another one in a list of many. Oaktree b (talk) 18:52, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for failing WP:BASIC. Subject was in a celebrity sex tape with a notable footballer. RS coverage focuses on the footballer and the scandal. The subject only gets only trivial coverage. No claim of WP:NACTOR notability asserted or supported. • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.