Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ozioma Egwuonwu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 12:55, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ozioma Egwuonwu[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are two problems with this article. First, it is blatantly promotional, using phrases such as "transformational leader". Second, she doesn't seem to have biographical notability which depends on independent sources. The first can be cured by blowing it up and starting over if she is notable. The second cannot. A Google search turns up a lot of hits, but they are all her own publicity. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:41, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:53, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:53, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:53, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete She's TOOSOON. I only found two mentions in the databases I have access to. Not enough in depth coverage yet. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:16, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Written like an advertorial rather than an encyclopedia article, and not reliably sourced to significant and substantive media coverage about her. Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. Bearcat (talk) 22:14, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Complete blank when searching for sources. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.