Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oysters Rockefeller (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 03:29, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oysters Rockefeller (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability uncertain; film has not yet been released. Google search for ("Oysters Rockefeller" + "Charles Rogers") does not indicate significant coverage. Contested prod. ... discospinster _talk 23:51, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom + WP:COI, as the film writer and article writer appear to be the same. This leads me to believe the article is being used as a promotional piece. -- WikHead (talk) 00:44, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 02:08, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete without prejudice for now per WP:NotJustYet. While the author's COI is always a concern (indicating that returning it to him is not the best option), the article itself is written in an encyclopedic manner with very neutral POV and does not seem to be promoting the film any more than other Wikipedia film articles "promote" other films. That said, this one is premature, does not merit being an exception to WP:NFF, and needs to be released and get coverage before an article is to be considered. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:39, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice, as it currently fails WP:NF. The article will be a good candidate for deletion review if the film is released and receives significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Lagrange613 (talk) 00:41, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Schmidt. Moogwrench (talk) 23:09, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.