Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oyoso3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 07:43, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oyoso3

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This band doesn't seem notable. I can't find any independent, reliable sources about this band in either English or Japanese. Mcampany (talk) 03:04, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Mcampany (talk) 03:04, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Mcampany (talk) 03:04, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can find nothing in reliable sources, and I was also unable to find much more under their Japanese name, およそ3 . Despite a lot of singles and videos (apparently) they are only present in the routine and self-created streaming services and social media, and they have not been noticed by significant music media in their country or anywhere else. Their Japan Wikipedia article ([1]) is also dependent on their own websites. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 00:05, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom and Doomsdayer520. I could not find anything reliable about them either. Streaming service entries and social media pages do not establish any notability. The sourcing on the Japanese article is dreadful as well, as it contains Twitter, Facebook and Youtube pages and a blog. We all know that these sites can't be used as sources because they are not reliable. Why are these crappy sources used in Wikipedia articles is beyond me. Of course if there are notable sources, then social media pages can be used too but relying solely on social media pages as sources is a horrible practice imo. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 15:00, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.