Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxwall
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:27, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Oxwall[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Oxwall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Still Not Notable. Clnreee (talk) 05:32, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:55, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 11:55, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 11:55, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
- Strong Delete All of the references are from Oxwall! How is this even a discussion? MaskedSinger (talk) 16:35, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: The most significant reference I can find to this software from a reliable, independent source is this passing mention in a post on the ICIJ's website. Seems to completely fail WP:NSOFT and WP:GNG. Comment: The article Wall.fm about a service from the same developers should probably be looked into as well. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 03:25, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.