Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owlwoman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Global Guardians. RL0919 (talk) 12:41, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Owlwoman[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable topic TTN (talk) 03:45, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 03:45, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 03:45, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Non-notable superhero._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 04:00, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge with Global Guardians. --Rtkat3 (talk) 17:12, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable topic. Andrew D. (talk) 17:54, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew, snarky comments parodying the nominator (which you also did here) are not helpful, and even if your comment was not a lazy inversion of what the TTN wrote you would need to demonstrate that the topic is notable. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 05:54, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can we maybe avoid speculating on other editors motives or intentions? Or at least, take it to their talkpage instead of the deletion debate? Ford MF (talk) 05:44, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Global Guardians. Only one independent source, but we need another to meet GNG. ミラ P 23:28, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Global Guardians. There does not appear to be enough coverage on this character for a separate article, but it is a useful search and the character is already discussed in the suggested target article. Aoba47 (talk) 23:42, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Global Guardians as suggested by Aoba47. Merging doesn't appear to be necessary, as there really isn't much here that isn't already also included in the target article. Rorshacma (talk) 15:43, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Global Guardians. No actual usable content to merge but the topic is already covered at the parent article and it seems like it would be a useful search term. Reyk _YO! 20:44, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable enough, and has been glossed in several sources before this. Updated article with further refs, and added a publication history section. Ford MF (talk) 05:42, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Could you explain how any of the references you added pass the mark of "significant coverage?" Each is simply a summary of her status as a minority-representative superhero, ranging from just a single name drop to a brief in-universe summary of her character. None of those provide any commentary on the character. They simply confirm she exists, which are certainly not "more than a trivial mention." TTN (talk) 13:32, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Ford MF. Not exactly policy that I know of, but maintaining representation and diversity is good as well. Perhaps the adds sway ミラ? -2pou (talk) 06:25, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: First list has revealed a broad range of views
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Britishfinance (talk) 11:59, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Global Guardians. Not notable enough of a fictional character to get its own article. Alpha⁴⁶¹⁵ _{(talk to me)} 20:05, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Global Guardians. It's all just plot (WP:NOT#PLOT) and trivial appearance info. – sgeureka ^t•c 10:06, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.