Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owen Holland (academic)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep (non-admin closure) as withdrawn by nominator with no other support for deletion WP:CSK#1 Pi (Talk to me!) 03:31, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Owen Holland (academic)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Has had an interesting career, but how does he meet WP:PROF or WP:GNG? Boleyn (talk) 16:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)~~[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 20:02, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 20:02, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I don't have a high opinion of biologically-inspired computation, but his citation record in it is high enough to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF#C1. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:50, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes WP:C#1 on GS cites in a highly cited field. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:46, 21 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Withdraw nomination oer comments above. Thanks for your help, Boleyn (talk) 06:50, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.