Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overabundance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:44, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Overabundance

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails MOS:DABMENTION and WP:DABDIC. Hoof Hearted (talk) 17:53, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 16:01, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 16:01, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Tagged as G6 for being an orphaned disambigious page. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 16:11, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I've declined the speedy, since technically the page doesn't qualify, but I agree that, since it's basically just a list of dictionary definitions, this dab page isn't useful, per nom. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:51, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: not a disambiguation page. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:03, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is purely WP:DICDEF, and decidedly not a disambiguation page. — Gorthian (talk) 01:34, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Gorthian. Nick Moyes (talk) 00:43, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.