Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Our Lady of Perpetual Succour Catholic Primary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to West Pymble, New South Wales#Schools. Sandstein 11:06, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Our Lady of Perpetual Succour Catholic Primary School[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Primary school, Kindergarten to Year 6. Review of gbooks and gnews fails to turn up multiple, notable, substantial, non-run-of-the-mill, independent RS coverage (note -- there are other schools by the same name elsewhere). Convention with such schools is, as I understand it, that they do not generally warrant a stand-alone article. Delete (w/redirect to whatever makes sense would be fine) appears to be in order. Epeefleche (talk) 08:16, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Epeefleche - as you have indicated you wish to delete this page, please give detailed and thoroughly researched reasons why it should be deleted, the above comments are simple generic comments

the comments about school with a similar name has no bearing on the article whatsoever

this article was put together by the students of the school , and it deletion would only have a devastating effect on them Banjopat talk 08:51, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I performed a wp:before search. I read everything that came up in it. I read every source in the article. I read the article itself. I failed to find multiple, notable, substantial, non-run-of-the-mill, independent RS coverage. I understand the general practice at wp with Primary-6 schools (such as this one) that lack what I failed to find is that they do not generally warrant a stand-alone article at the Project. My comment which you indicate "had no bearing", as to schools with a same name in different countries, was just to help other editors who arrive at this page, who will themselves perform similar searches, by flagging for them the fact that their initial search results (depending how they construct them) may yield schools that bear the same name as the one at issue but which are not the same school. By the way -- what is your connection to the school, if any? Thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 09:08, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:38, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to West Pymble, New South Wales, notability not established to warrant a stand-alone article. Wikipedia is not a school web host. WWGB (talk) 01:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to West Pymble, New South Wales, as above.Doctorhawkes (talk) 03:24, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect. The article does not appear to merit a standalone article. There is useful encyclopaedic information here which, rather than be deleted, should be added to the West Pymble page in the schools section. Dahliarose (talk) 20:57, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per the above given that there's no sign of the relevant notability guideline (WP:ORG) being met. Nick-D (talk) 09:04, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.