Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Our Lady of Lourdes Academy of Bacoor, Cavite

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Our Lady of Lourdes Academy of Bacoor, Cavite

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The previous AfD only brought forth sources verifying the existence of the Academy, but they were so thin that they did nothing to prove the school meets notability guidelines. Schools are not automatically notable, there still needs to be significant coverage and this school simply does not have that. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:49, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Previous AfD can be found at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Our Lady of Lourdes Academy of Bacoor Cavite, Inc.. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:54, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 01:25, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 01:25, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Two years of development and the article is still a single line with a dubious reference. I'm not sure that even passes WP:V. The list of potential sources seem to be all mentions in lists and mirrors of the Wikipedia article. We don't know enough from the available references to create an article. Jack N. Stock (talk) 03:05, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A quick check on Google only have a few hits, most of them social media en Wikipedia-mirrors. Now that Schooloutcomes is finally discounted, we can judge the article on its merits. And than you draw a blank... The Banner talk 09:40, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because, as I explained in the first AfD, while there are sources that serve the bare purpose of verifying that this school exists, the coverage is so thin that there is nothing to base an article on. Cordless Larry (talk) 06:58, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can show existence on various lists, but this is indeed sub-minimal. DGG ( talk ) 11:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above comments.Seraphim System ^(talk) 13:55, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.