Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Our Dumb Century

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Our Dumb Century[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

topic is not notable, article relies on one source serioushat 09:30, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Widely read publication by comedy writers from a notable website. Keep Our Dumb World as well. Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 18:25, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Easy keep Granted, there should be sourcing for such things as being #1 on the New York Times Best Seller List [1] and winning the Thurber Prize for American Humor [2], but it's hard to make a judgment that a topic is not notable when even a simple search suggests otherwise. [3] [4]. Mandsford 18:54, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Widely read and quoted comedy publication. 2 says you, says two 22:03, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Notable, sourceable, widely read, etc. T (Formerly Known as FireSpike) 01:02, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:SNOWBALL and clean up.--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 00:27, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.