Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ottavio Scarlattini

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 08:30, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ottavio Scarlattini

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about 17th century man who wrote 3 books in Italian. Person seems entirely non-notable. FeralOink (talk) 08:25, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philosophy and History. FeralOink (talk) 08:25, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Italy. Shellwood (talk) 09:28, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's a mess but there's a lot more in the Italian version and Scarlattini undoubtedly existed and was arguably notable. Deletion ain't cleanup (I removed the copyvio text) but this will take quite a cleanup. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 11:08, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes WP:SIGCOV. Google books has many sources which address the subject directly and in detail, including an entire chapter on him in this book beginning on page 373. I've added several references to the article. Best.4meter4 (talk) 16:59, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep not seeing how this subject could be non notable. Mccapra (talk) 18:58, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep significant coverage in Italian sources 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 18:29, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, lazy nom, total lack of WP:BEFORE. Cavarrone 08:29, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.