Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Other Minds (music)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 23:25, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Other Minds (music)[edit]
- Other Minds (music) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article does not make a claim to notability, and it seems clear that it does not pass WP:CLUB as the organization is not national - as the article also contains no third person sources, and no other articles link toit, it seems reasonable to question its notability and as whether it has been created mostly for promotional purposes.·Maunus·ƛ· 23:17, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The music festival this organisation runs has attracted coverage over multiple years ([1], [2] are aexamples), and includes coverage outside of just the SF area (LA Times). At the very least, it should be a merge to Charles Amirkhanian as co-founder, and festival director. I see no good reason for deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 17:41, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:50, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CTJF83 chat 00:31, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.