Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osita Henry Chikere

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:03, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Osita Henry Chikere

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Per WP:NFOOTY you actually have to appear in a match to be notable - having signed a contract with a club in a fully pro league is not enough. PROD was contested by an IP without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:02, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:04, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence he meets notability. The two references just list basic info - one is his club site and the other is Transfermarkt, which is not generally considered to be reliable/have sufficient overview. Eldumpo (talk) 08:21, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 11:14, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.