Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was tedious delete. DS 22:37, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Osism[edit]

Nonsense about a "newly founded religion". Was speedy-tagged, but tag replaced by Prod tag ("WP:V and no assertion of notability/significant following"), which was subsequently removed without comment by the article creator. Not merely a delete, but a speedy one, in my opnion. Calton | Talk 07:46, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Looks fake, smells fake, probably is fake. Only online ref I could find is here Raffles mk 08:43, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The gooda have ordered that this unfunny practical joke be expunged. Delete Edeans 11:26, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm all in favor of founding new religions—I've founded several—but I don't try to list them on Wikipedia. (Although I think Javacrucianism could do well if I really pushed it.) :) Xtifr _tälk 12:17, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. For the record, I did not delete the speedy tag when I added the prod tag, though I'm not 100% sure why I added the prod when it was already tagged speedy... Must have been a little sleep-deprived when that happened. --JaimeLesMaths ^(talk|edits) 12:54, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because this article was obviously written by a heretic, who gets Osism wrong in important respects. I know, because I'm the high walla-balla of true, orthodox Osism. Pending my preparation of a valid article on the subject (which will take some time), wikipedia should remain silent. --Christofurio 14:07, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it's funny. it's not heretic in any way. it's not presenting any false information. KEEP IT!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.29.219.224 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 22 October 2006
Delete Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. M1ss1ontom a rs2k4 ^{(T | C | @)} 16:23, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Bollocks made up in school one day . -- IslaySolomon | talk 16:24, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as attack against "Alyssa", who clearly is a real person that the creator of the article villifies. Otherwise just delete as ridiculous hoax and thing made up in school one day. --N Shar 17:13, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete stupid religioncruft. Danny Lilithborne 00:13, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Author removed AfD notice from the page. Replaced. Danny Lilithborne 01:03, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as an attack. I've tagged it as such. -- Scientizzle 22:28, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.