Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Os Cangaceiros
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete due to lack of reliable sources. If someone can find suitable sources, feel free to create a rewritten version, citing those sources. — TKD::Talk 01:18, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Os Cangaceiros (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Practically unreadable screed about some anarchists. The single "source" only has one Google hit that I can tell, which doesn't inspire much confidence. I see no real notability, and no hope of salvaging the article. Biruitorul 00:48, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. If you delete their article, they will officially cease to exist, because there will then be no information about them for people (spies?) to research. Therefore they will go away, just ask the Ostrich. Os Cangaceiros (Yippie!) 01:00, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems non-notable, if they did all they did there would be at least 10,000
g-hits. -FlubecaTalk 01:06, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Er... There's 4 times that many. Try looking under "Les Fossoyeurs du vieux monde" Os Cangaceiros (Yippie!) 01:11, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Very weak keep for now, could potentially be an encyclopedic topic though NOT in its current barely-readable form. I can't even figure out from the article how important or notable this strange little group actually was...K. Lásztocska 01:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. Lacks multiple, independent, significant sources to demonstrate notability. --Malcolmxl5 18:28, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.