Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ortiz (wrestler) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Latin American Xchange. Randykitty (talk) 15:55, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ortiz (wrestler)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

And Santana (wrestler)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject are not independently notable.

Articles have been reverted from the redirect to The Latin American Xchange several times without discussion (and in contradiction to previous AfD, though consensus can change). Suggest to re-establish redirect to The Latin American Xchange Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 07:14, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Latin American Xchange as per prior AfD.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:35, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to The Latin American Xchange. Not independently notable. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:45, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to The Latin American Xchange, then protect to prevent recreation. Still not independently notable.LM2000 (talk) 20:39, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header. Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:03, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. LM2000 (talk) 14:23, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Second AfD isn't neccesary. Redirect and page protect/SALT Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:53, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect As nom said, consensus can change so I do think a second AfD is appropriate, but ultimately they're still not notable. Against SALTing in case they become notable in the future, that makes it harder to restore. Just deal with disruptive editors as we normally would. Smartyllama (talk) 21:43, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @Smartyllama: the redirects could be protected for 1-2 years. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 07:11, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.