Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orthodox Halakha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy close, for obvious reasons. El_C 14:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orthodox Halakha[edit]

Strong Delete, Orthodox Judaism and Jews rely on traditional Halacha when they seek a ruling, all Halacha books by and for Orthodox Jews cite traditional Halacha sources. Is a WP:POVFORK of Halakha. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FrummerThanThou (talk • contribs)

NOTE: This is a fruadulent vote, read on... This article was created by User:FrummerThanThou [1] and then within ten minutes he nominates this, his own article, for deletion [2] [3]. So what is he up to? He is upset that his nomination for deletion [4] of the well-established article Conservative Halakha (a label he does not like) is going nowhere, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conservative Halakha (and about which he admits that he lacks intelligent information [5]), so he creates a bogus article about "Orthodox Halakha" (not needed since we already have two articles Orthodox Judaism and Halakha that cover this topic in great depth) and says openly "this page has been created over ambig regards what halacha is in the Conservative Halakha discussion. please help with creating reform halakha, reconstructionist halacha, mesorti halcha zionist halacha!" [6] and to add insult to injury he slaps a {{humor}} template on the talk page [7] (is that his idea of a "joke"? -- when these are serious matters.) The problem is, it's IMPOSSIBLE to know if he is serious or joking because he is acting as a law unto himself at this point, and I for one, have had to correct his disruptive editing in articles relating to Judaism too many times recently (he seems to feel he can change anything at any time any way he wants...), and his antics are now going over the top. He then flies off with the bizarre request at User talk:Crzrussian: "Please block me and my IP for 7 days, i've got some importnt things coming up and I don't trust myself to keep off totaly." [8]. Now this is a very serious matter, it reveals erratic behavior and irresponsible attitude for editing an encyclopedia, and it clear shows that User:FrummerThanThou is not just deliberately in violation of WP:HOAX but he is also in violation of Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point and perhaps it is time to consider blocking him for this pattern of disruptive behavior. Thank you. IZAK 10:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE 2: Seems that User:FrummerThanThou has now gone totally beserk, see his wild and crazy comments: "DHUH you are jew! ha! how uncool! anyways i just though i would stick that fact in YOUR face!! This template is all about that yeah!!... check out that massive star of david there, yeah!! cool isn't it?! so TOTALY superjewish!!!! oh please dont run away you confused soul! soon you will find your wiki self and i'll show the template i was realy going to welcome you with! Check history, this template used to be normal, untill it was suggested it wasnt." [9] "Hey! where you running off to!??! join our wikiproject.... hey!! come back!! join!!" [10]. This was all in response to him being upset about Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 December 14#Template:Bruchim. He is spinning out of control and must be stopped ASAP. IZAK 11:22, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Orthodox Judaism, and discipline User:FrummerThanThou with an official Wikipedia:Requests for comment or more, because he is not only wasting other editors' time but also disrupting Wikipedia, as this (un) "humorously" contrived (non) "vote" proves. I have notified a few admins about the problems with User:FrummerThanThou and request that they take the appropriate action/s ASAP. Thank you. IZAK 10:43, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep as a bad faith nomination and violation of WP:POINT. We shouldn't drop the content of the article just because of the creator. Someone should go through it and see if the article is worth keeping or anything to merge into Orthodox Judaism. Unless you've already done that, IZAK, in which case leave it as it is. Koweja 14:25, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.