Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oronjo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fabrictramp (talk) 16:26, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oronjo[edit]

Marked for speedy deletion. The Article is about a company, and from what I can see, the company has several products out, so I'll have to say it should be saved. But it isn't really up to me.--xgmx (T | C | D | R | DR)

Delete This company fails WP:CORP. No coverage in reliable independent sources. Cenarium (talk) 14:22, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This can be speedied. Also, the creator, User:Xgmx dontworry imgoodnow, is a sockpuppet of an indef-blocked user. Cenarium (talk) 15:14, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - Real organization with no assertion of notability. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:18, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Google turns up nothing that would show this company meets WP:ORG. Tan | 39 18:03, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, absolutely no assertion of notability, no references other than a blog post. "Has several products out" was a fairly daft reason to remove the speedy tag, but no objections to letting this afd run its course to be done with it. Kuru ^talk 19:30, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.