Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orode Doherty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 11:55, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orode Doherty

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the sources are giving the subject enough significant coverage. They only make some mere mention about her. All of them are talking about something else rather than this person. I also did a WP:Before and could not find anything. This might be written for promotional purpose. Clearly fails WP:GNG Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 04:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 04:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 04:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 04:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 04:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 04:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Contribution to scholarship is negligible. Not enough other stuff for WP:GNG. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:44, 17 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Delete fails both academic notability and GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Current coverage fails in GNG. Setreis (talk) 15:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clearly doesn't meet NPROF C1–6 or GNG. Also clearly doesn't meet NPROF C7 (or C8), as the only examples of her giving "expert advice" in the news are this tiny article from The Punch, a few articles from The Guardian (Nigeria), and a trivial namedrop in the NYT here. JoelleJay (talk) 05:04, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The subject fails to meet WP:GNG and seems to have written as WP:PROMO breaching the neutral tone. Abishe (talk) 14:51, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet GNG or NPROF and it would have to be completely rewritten even if it did fulfill notability guidelines. Natureium (talk) 18:59, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 12:56, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.