Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orland Kurtenblog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orland Kurtenblog

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I find a number of results, which are really just blog posts and mentions of the blog's namesake. The only notability claim appears to be another blogger's naming of this one as one of his tops - no official award. Therefore no indication it meets Web. I earlier declined speedy as I didn't and still don't think it's an A7 StarM 00:42, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. -- StarM 00:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- StarM 00:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with Star Mississippi's assertion that this fails WP:WEB. Specifically, criterion #1 isn't met, as detailed above; criterion #2 isn't met, as the award they received is not "a well-known and independent award from either a publication or organization"; and criterion #3 does not appear to be met, at least not so far as I can tell. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article basically says "This blog exists". nn Reso lute 02:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Much, as a hockey fanatic of the era, I enjoy seeing Orland Kurtenbach's name memorialized, I can't see what criteria of WP:WEB this site meets. Ravenswing 03:18, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.