Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organizational accident science
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:42, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Organizational accident science (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable neologism. Google search shows 2 ghits [1]. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 16:15, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. What the heck is "...the compensated programmers will begin adding the materials"?? Is this related to "All your base are belong to us"? By the way, the "peer review" mentioned has already begun, and it isn't looking good. Non-notable, a neologism, and borderline speedy-delete as nonsense. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Calling it a neologism is being a bit kind, in my opinion. And the part about "compensated programmers will begin adding the materials" strongly suggests this is spam. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:01, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This sounded kind of legit at first, but the Google search convinced me. Keepscases (talk) 17:09, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Expand if possible, but delete otherwise; the article only consists of one sentence and a handfull of links; it couldn't possibly amount to anything without serious expansion. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 19:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Speedy delete; recreation of an already deleted article, and the article was written as SPAM (see edit history of the article). GO-PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 19:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with extreme prejudice due to the mention of "compensated programmers". Creator is about to be blocked for his username, as well. Daniel Case (talk) 19:58, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I love that "compensated programmers" phrase. I've heard of a "compensated endorser" before, when Ed McMahon or Alex Trebek is selling old folks insurance in a TV commercial, but never "compensated programmers." How do I get a gig like that? - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 02:25, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.