Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ordo Aequitas Albion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) 00:37, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ordo Aequitas Albion

no citations, probably a hoax Tom Harrison ^Talk 00:11, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article even admits it's unverifiable. --Rory0 96 00:17, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Impressively unverifiable. --Allen 00:18, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, by definition unverifiable and with no Google matches. -- Mithent 00:22, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unencyclopedic from every angle. Royboy crashfan 00:35, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Bad ideas 00:51, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, speculative. --Rockpocket 01:23, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as original research / unverifiable, possible hoax. — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 01:51, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. "Unknown secret order." Unverifiable. — TheKMan^talk 01:56, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete original research. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 2006-03-08 02:10Z
Delete Not Wikipedia in spirit, style or content. --die Baumfabrik 02:22, 8 March 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Delete per nom --Krashlandon (e) 02:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. not encyclopedic Bucketsofg 05:57, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Is as unverifiable as the article admits. Jude(talk,contribs) 07:40, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (I'm a member...) -- Samir T C 07:49, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unencyclopedic, original research. --Ter e nc e Ong 08:37, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete impossible to verify. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 08:57, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Impossible to verify. Staxringold 12:53, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 13:35, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This sounds like the secret club my cousin and I made up back in about first grade. Grandmasterka 15:16, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per above. -- Alpha269 15:18, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it's impossible-to-verify material. —LrdChaos 16:46, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:V. --AaronS 16:52, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete one of the most comprehensively unverifiable stubs I can recall! Just zis Guy you know? 18:57, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I think it's unanimous at this point and can be killed off.--み使い Mitsukai 21:18, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete per nom I Love Plankton 21:30, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Shoulda just used {{prod}} on this one. Cyde Weys 22:03, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sure this Delete vote will be the one just barely squeaking it by. - dharm a bum 06:34, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete just to be safe. Melchoir 08:12, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.