Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orascom Development

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 03:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orascom Development[edit]

Orascom Development (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Egyptian company. I have declined CSD; it was nominated as "G11 - pure advertising" but I disagree that this would need to be fundamentally rewritten to be encyclopaedic. It also just scrapes across the A7 bar, in my view, with the description of their operations in the Middle East. Nonetheless, it does not seem to me to meet the GNG or anything at NORG. GoldenRing (talk) 12:36, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 13:57, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 13:57, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I guess. The article is abysmally sourced, but Google News turns up multiple examples of decent coverage that look like the company meets WP:CORP. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:19, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep for the same reasons as above: it is a well-known business. Dormskirk (talk) 21:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.