Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opus-dei: existence after religion
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:12, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Opus-dei: existence after religion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Much of the prose is copied from http://www.opus-dei.co.uk/, and it doesn't seem to be very notable anyway. —ems24 01:02, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems like a clear WP:COPYVIO here, much of the text comes form the above website which has a clear copyright notice on it. Should this be speedied? Fenix down (talk) 10:25, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It may even be a promotional activity by the company, as the same piece was created today under the similar lemma Opus-Dei: Existence After Religion, also by a user (Pollux.rees (talk · contribs)) who registered only today, similar as the other article (True-grit (talk · contribs)). Interestingly, both versions/lemmas were started by using the <big>-switch for the whole piece of text. --Túrelio (talk) 13:33, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.