Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Optiks (record producer)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:46, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Optiks (record producer)[edit]
- Optiks (record producer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable music producer. He may have worked with some known artists, but the last I looked, notability was not inherited. Lacks in-depth support for individual's notability. reddogsix (talk) 23:56, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Subject fails WP:GNG. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 06:18, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable music producer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:32, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:51, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. Also, article creator is a WP:SPA with probable WP:COI, suggesting a promotional motive to the article - contrary to our policies on what Wikipedia is not. Citobun (talk) 14:28, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.