Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpsRamp (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:57, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OpsRamp[edit]

OpsRamp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability seems to have remained at the same low level as when it was draftified following the preceding AfD: press releases, in-house announcements, now flavoured with two undistinguished list mentions. I suggest this fails WP:NCORP. Note: jumped out of AfC by author. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:21, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete or Speedy delete Poor attempt to bypass AfC leaving talk page behind and subvert previous AfD. Sources poor and insufficiently improved. Previous draftification abused.Djm-leighpark (talk) 15:01, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:45, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:46, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:47, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:47, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I wasn't able to find anything remotely notable when I searched for sources. Fails WP:NCORP. Whispering 18:58, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete should have worked with AfC. I'm going to remove the AfC templates now to get it off our pending list. Legacypac (talk) 21:42, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.