Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oppix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. enochlau (talk) 00:44, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppix

This article was written by Oppix and is quite clearly a company vanity and an advertisement. Alexa gives it no traffic rank. Delete. JHMM13 (T | C) 04:22, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 04:46, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Hi JHMM13 and Jwestbrook. We wrote this article but we DO NOT tell anyone to buy anything from us! We describe a vision of augmented experience from the comfort of your couch. We believe that people are interested in getting information and this article is informative. This article is part of our effort to bring the immersive technology and the virtual tours to consciousness. Hope you care and understand. Please do not delete this article or provide me with guidelines on how I can write this article that will be suitable in your opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.64.98.91 (talk • contribs)
- No matter how well written an article is, if the subject is non-notable then people will propose it be deleted. This is an encyclopedia, not a web directory. Ifnord 17:05, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete. 627 google hits, many seem unrelated. --Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 10:49, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. Werdna648^T/_C\^@ 12:17, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for a total disregard of what an encyclopedia even is. --Agamemnon2 12:53, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Agamemnon. Wow. RasputinAXP _talk _contribs 14:12, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppix should be deleted. Oppix is not liked much by me. Oppix is vanity. Oppix will not lead a good life. ' 15:02, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Tim Pierce 15:55, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. NeoJustin 17:01, January 2, 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom and non-noteworthy. Ifnord 17:05, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.