Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opmantek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 14:51, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Opmantek[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the notability guideline for companies. Though I was able to find one decent article in the Sydney Morning Herald, NCORP requires multiple qualifying sources. See also AfDs for its software NMIS and Open-AudIT (all created by the same obvious COI editor LoCrow (talk · contribs)). – Teratix ₵ 12:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 12:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 12:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 12:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete: Obviously promotion QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 17:04, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not written from an independant perspective. Teraplane (talk) 00:42, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.