Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oplaca

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Closed as moot. Article was deleted by User:John, apparently after page blanking by original author, which makes this a speedy deletion matter. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 07:16, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oplaca[edit]

The article claims this company is the largest data solutions company in the world, but no sources are there to back this up. Also, the article reads suspiciously like an advertisement. weburiedoursecrets inthegarden 14:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Tons of Googe hits, but the overwhelming majority are in a Slavic language in which it "Oplaca" appears to be a word. The first and only prominent English-language hit is... The Wikipedia page under discussion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vafthrudnir (talk • contribs) 18:40, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, either a hoax or extremely unnotable. HGiQ was speedied as spam earlier today, as was Hemingway Gabriel. This is the only thing vaguely legit that I found. --Dhartung | Talk 19:10, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. An entirely unreferenced article about a non-consumer tech services business. If this were indeed the largest provider of data "solutions", you'd expect more people to have heard about it. Possible hoax, and therefore speedily deletable as vandalism. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above; good catch (yet-another-hoax). Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 17:38, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. I have nothing to add beyond that which has already been stated. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 20:56, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.