Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation C.O.R.O.N.A (novel)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Operation C.O.R.O.N.A (novel)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was originally just a plot summary when I came across it at NPP. A quick check of twitter/the publisher's website shows this is the only book the publisher has ever released, the only two sources are clearly primary, and a search brought up only an Amazon link and a bunch of self-promotional forum posts. Fails WP:GNG. SportingFlyer T·C 20:27, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 20:27, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 20:27, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 20:27, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There's just not anything out there to show where this book is notable. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 21:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sign that the book meets the requirements of WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. Oddly, it looks like this is the only book ever published by this publisher so this may in effect be a self-published book. Pichpich (talk) 21:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you see that this book currently lacks sufficient evidence to meet Wikipedia's WP:NBOOK requirement, then you are welcome to delete it.Viewerindepth (talk) 21:37, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
YupDelete. Non-notable book. -CoronaEditor (talk) 05:00, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a total lack of reliable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Books are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist — the notability test for a book requires some reliably sourced evidence of significance, such as noteworthy literary awards and/or reviews from professional critics in real newspapers, magazines and literary journals. The fact that the book's existence can technically be verified on the self-published websites of its author and publisher is not, in and of itself, enough to get a book over the inclusion standards for books. Bearcat (talk) 15:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not meet WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG, gsearch brings up zero reviews. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:10, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.