Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Bootstrap Concentration Camp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Either nonsense or abuse, and either reason will do for removing it. DGG ( talk ) 05:14, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Bootstrap Concentration Camp

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article makes uncited claims about physical mistreatment of Puerto Ricans during Operation Bootstrap. I can't locate any sources to support the claims, all the links on the page are either deadlinks or lead only to headline pages e.g. Washington Post and the use of an image of a pig farm with the title of "Operation Bootstrap Concentration Camp" suggests that this is solely an attack page. NtheP (talk) 20:41, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - The article seems to be collection of unrelated topics. I think it may actually qualify as vandalism. - Mr X 20:54, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - Reading through the article, it just doesn't make sense. The individual paragraphs make sense seperately, but when put together, it becomes nonsense/vandalism. Josh3580_talk/hist 21:01, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated it as CSD G3 Vandalism. The editor is evidently copy pasting from other articles in an attempt to disrupt our fine encyclopedia. - Mr X 20:58, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment just seen the additions since I tagged it, and yes it does now look like complete rubbish being cut and pasted from other articles. NtheP (talk) 21:13, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Some of the 'extraneous' bits aren't totally irrelevant to Puerto Rico, but there appears to be tampering with them. Others are irrelevant to the subject. Generally unencyclopaedic. Not sure about 'vandalism', so I haven't deleted it as such. More like WP:OR. Peridon (talk) 22:06, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you're assuming more good faith than I am. I'm baffled as to what Dadaism or the Chicago World's Fair have to do with a concentration camp. BTW, I've also started an SPI on the article creator and the very helpful IP. - Mr X 22:16, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. If the subject is a real topic, someone can write a legitimate article about it instead of this incoherent article. And if the subject is not a real topic, this article deserves to get deleted immediately. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:54, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, possible speedy delete as vandalism or test page. Hairhorn (talk) 02:30, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.