Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open strategy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 07:16, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Open strategy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTDICTIONARY. Comatmebro (talk) 04:58, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:19, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:37, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:07, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Return to draft. while it might be possible to write an encyclopedic article about "open strategy", this article is not that one. An article might start with an historical approach, when was the concept developed, by whom, for what reasons; then go to an analysis of the concept's components, who is considered an "outsider" and who are stake-holders, what are the pros and cons of adopting an open strategy; then deal with aspects of actual use, what industries or environs typically use open strategies, etc. Simply throwing a bunch of citations together with a definition is not a good start. Learn the subject, outline an article, then write the article using appropriate reliable sources that actually discuss the concept, not just implement it, to support individual points. --Bejnar (talk) 21:32, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not an encycopedia article. No point returning it to draft--it would need to be started again. DGG ( talk ) 19:36, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.