Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open access in Belarus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:53, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Open access in Belarus[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There being (according to an almost-unsourced text dump of an article) practically no open access in Belarus, I have to question the notability of this as a standalone article subject. There are a couple of others along these lines, but I'll nominate them separately to allow their merits to be discussed. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:19, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belarus-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:03, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 23:33, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. - GretLomborg (talk) 19:11, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I briefly considered calling this a "soft delete" but it's been Proded before so that won't work.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:17, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.