Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Cities

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 07:18, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Open Cities

The author told me that this was his original concept. Since then he appears to have started his own wiki on SourceForge.

• Delete, no original research. Gazpacho 13:00, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. ~MDD4696 22:18, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• Move?, Perhaps this debate is over the ambiguity of the title, and it should simply be renamed 'Open cities in light of Expo 2010'? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johan Engelbrecht (talk • contribs)
• Keep, We are in the process today of making a fundamental choice about how we will communicate with each other in the next century. In fact, we are talking about the wrong thing, at the wrong time,and making this choice (which may be right) for the wrong reasons or for no reason at all. Quote from Overcoming Agoraphobia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johan Engelbrecht (talk • contribs)
  • No, the title isn't the issue. Wikipedia has a policy of no original research (in particular, No original research#What is excluded?). It's not the place to publish your ideas that will change the world. Change the world first, then we can have an article. Gazpacho 08:02, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.