Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Books
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement CSD G12. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:59, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Open Books (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Speedy-A7/G11 removed by an IP. Spammy article (it even uses the word "we") about a non-notable website. Speedy delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 04:53, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:24, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Much of the content is directly copied from here where it is marked as Copyright. The remainder is just instructions for use. So (a) the content would be down to one sentence once that was removed and (b) there is no assertion or evidence of notability. CSD G11/12 & A7. AllyD (talk) 07:54, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per above. There's no real assertion of notability and the article is so spammy that it would require a complete rewrite to show notability. If there are sources out there, they're fairly well hidden in my search.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 16:48, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.