Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenGeofiction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:44, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OpenGeofiction[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure if it passes WP:GNG. It has been around for a long time, but not much of discussions/mention of it online. So instead of ProD, I brought it to AfD, so the subject can be discussed by multiple editors. Thank. —usernamekiran(talk) 09:11, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Insufficient coverage ([1]) in reliable sources- no WP:DEPTH or WP:PERSISTENCE of coverage either, which is fundamental to demonstrating notability. — O Fortuna^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 11:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:38, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- unsourced original research & no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:56, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.