Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenGL User Interface Library

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to OpenGL#Associated libraries. (non-admin closure) Lourdes 12:54, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OpenGL User Interface Library

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing on behalf of an IP. Their rationale is “not notable and has no references.” Beeblebrox (talk) 18:48, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 22:27, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 22:27, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 22:27, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep References available on Google Scholar. ISBN-13: 978-0387689920 also references. I've added some to article. As given IP does not seem to have notified contributors likely inadequate WP:BEFORE.Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:31, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to OpenGL. The GS citations are not remotely enough for notability. All they show is that WP:EXIST. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:52, 14 July 2018 (UTC).[reply]
Redirect to OpenGL. Still not enough reliable sources to be notable. Snowycats (talk) 03:54, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:58, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Merge into OpenGL#Associated libraries.~~ Not notable enough on its own, but it's a perfect match as a subsection here. Newslinger (talk) 12:34, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not perfect as the result may have undue weight compared to the other libraries in the section which have their own article, which either result in undue weight in an already longish target article which has its own issues which are possibly more important.Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:58, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to OpenGL#Associated libraries. That's true. Newslinger (talk) 05:09, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.