Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OoShirts
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 18:29, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- OoShirts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
ooShirts is a run-of-the-mill Internet business that sells shirts. Little to no mention in third-party reliable sources: blogs and press releases abound, but this company hardly seems famous or notable. Jsharpminor (talk) 21:53, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Is there a rationale to this? - frankie (talk) 22:05, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There, fixed: rationale added. Jsharpminor (talk) 22:19, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - for some reason it gets more than a passing mention in reliable source SF Chronicle and Inc. but I was unable to find any others. So it maybe passes Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) depending on your interpretation. One RS is definitely not enough they say, but I don't think this gets enough coverage to satisfy notability. Of course, it is possible that more and better sources will show up. Metal.lunchbox (talk) 22:55, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. The SF Chronicle and Inc.com items are good, and while the others are too entrepreneur-related, most of them are independent, and I think there's enough of them to meet WP:GNG, albeit barely - frankie (talk) 16:02, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:04, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete Tiny internet company. Article is reasonably encyclopedic. The two best references are wp:notability-like, but look like a fluke. North8000 (talk) 14:28, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.