Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ontic
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Ontology. Liz Read! Talk! 00:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Ontic[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ontic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Adjective - we usually discuss such concepts under articles on related nouns (here, Ontology). Given very poor references, WP:OR is an issue, and separate notability from the related noun is not clear. Merge, redirect or keep (and if keep, any volunteers to improve this ORish mess)? WP:TNT is also a consideration. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:44, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:44, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Merge with Ontology: It will need some sourcing improvements, but it could probably be integrated well. DrowssapSMM 14:35, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to ontology - neutral on whether there is anything worth merging. Shapeyness (talk) 16:34, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.